Hearing from those directly impacted by climate change, such as head of the Association of Small Island States, Dessima Williams, (above) reminds us what’s at stake for dozens of nations and their millions of citizens.
by Kevin Hsu
Published Monday December 14, 2009
COPENHAGEN, COP15 - We were heading into a briefing for civil society by United Nationns Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) head Yvo de Boer, when I noticed a gaggle of cameras and a crowd of conference-goers gathering a short distance from the auditorium entrance. I slipped out of line, and as I edged closer, I realized AOSIS (Association of Small Island States, a bloc of 43 countries) was holding a press conference to lay out the group’s negotiating position.
In the wake of the uproar over Tuvalu’s proposals the previous day, here was another bold statement by island nations. The first speaker, Dessima Williams of Grenada and head of AOSIS, was quite articulate. She emphasized AOSIS are on the “very frontlines of the impacts of climate change.” Many have already suffered damage, and will be subject to greater impacts in the future.
Watching her, it really hit me: these people are fighting for their homes. With global warming and rising sea levels, whole communities might simply disappear under the waves. I had understood this conceptually, but to hear someone facing this prospect make such a calm, yet impassioned statement -- when essentially everything is at stake -- somehow made the story became real for me in a way it hadn’t been before. For them, it’s not merely an academic discussion of how many percent, from what base year, under what scenarios. It’s not a political question of “What’s acceptable to domestic audiences?” It’s a question of survival.
Key demands by AOSIS:
- Warming not above 1.5 degrees C from pre-industrial (in contrast to the the 2 degrees C that has been widely circulated by other proposals)
- This means stabilizing at 350 ppm, rather than 450 ppm, and will require much deeper cuts from developed countries.
- Significantly more funding for adaptation
- A legally-binding instrument. Though many have said only a political agreement is achievable next week, AOSIS wants the outcome to be legally binding.
Left to right: Selwin Hart of Barbados, AOSIS negotiator, Mohamed Aslam, Minister of the Environment for the Maldives, and Williams)
The speakers were adamant that these were fundamental demands, but it remains unclear whether this action was meant to stake out an aggressive negotiating position to create space for a more favorable agreement, or if these are really make-it-or-break-it conditions. In any case, with 2 degrees of warming, some islands are still going under, and we’ll have populations, or even whole countries, that will be forced to migrate.
For us in the United States, a climate treaty usually calls to mind energy efficiency and renewables, cleaner technology and greener jobs—things that I wholeheartedly support and that many of us are willing to dedicate our careers to achieving. We see in a global agreement a catalyst to help renew American society and move it toward a more sustainable path.
But sometimes it’s good to hear from those who are first in the line of fire, whose lives are directly impacted by the challenges we face. Such stories paint a clear picture what’s at really at stake -- not just the economies, but the very existence, of dozens of nations.
Kevin Hsu is an M.S. Candidate in the Atmosphere/Energy Program of Stanford University's Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering
For video of Dessima Williams’ speech:
- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M2R3jIjewGk (clips)
- Speakers included Dessima Williams (Grenada), head of AOSIS; Selwin Hart (Barbados), NY-based negotiator for AOSIS; Mohamed Aslam, Minister of the Environment for the Maldives.
- This is not the same as the Tuvalu proposal from yesterday, and in her remarks, Williams took pains to point this out. The speakers noted that they are working with China, India and other G77 nations to try to formulate the new plan, compared to the Tuvalu plan, which engendered China and India’s opposition.
- The press is fast. There were several news crews recording the whole affair, which ended right before lunch. By 2 p.m., some stories were already published: